<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WordPress Widgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://widgets.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Lorelle calls it "accessorizing"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Conceiving Widgets 2.0 by Viper007Bond</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-28978</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper007Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-28978</guid>
		<description>Move away from "Sidebar Widgets" and to "Widgets" in general.

Many, many people use widgets to control content in general rather than just their sidebar.

For example, can you imagine an entirely widgetized theme? You could control the layout of the theme, what order post details are shown in, etc.

The admin page also need to be redesigned to better handle more widget... panes? as well as widgets themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move away from &#8220;Sidebar Widgets&#8221; and to &#8220;Widgets&#8221; in general.</p>
<p>Many, many people use widgets to control content in general rather than just their sidebar.</p>
<p>For example, can you imagine an entirely widgetized theme? You could control the layout of the theme, what order post details are shown in, etc.</p>
<p>The admin page also need to be redesigned to better handle more widget&#8230; panes? as well as widgets themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy by PvUtrix</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/deep-thoughts-by-jack-handy/#comment-26814</link>
		<dc:creator>PvUtrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/deep-thoughts-by-jack-handy/#comment-26814</guid>
		<description>Due to possible copyright infringement issues brought to my attention this widget is no longer available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to possible copyright infringement issues brought to my attention this widget is no longer available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conceiving Widgets 2.0 by bj</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-14880</link>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-14880</guid>
		<description>I'm a theme developer. One of my biggest gripes with the stock widget plugin is the inability to lose the h2 tag in the text widgets without hacking the widget plugin, but that shuts them off for ALL text widgets.

Most people who use the text widgets want to use them for ads and such. If I style the h2 tags in themes to do fun visual stuff, and we use the stock widget plugin and don't want a headline for a specific ad block, what happens is the h2 tag shows up empty and the styling shows up also, even though we didn't want it there. Not good. So it would be great if there was an option for each text widget to turn the h2 off. It would also be great to have this same option on Pages widget block.

There's also a gotcha with text widgets in another way. If you populate a text widget then decide you need more text widgets, and go into admin and create them you currently LOSE the data in the ones you already created. Not good. I haven't tried this with the rss widgets to see if there is the same problem, since I don't use those as extensively. A way to back up or save that data or at the very least a warning in admin that people should back up the db before making changes there would lessen some headbanging.

Some of my layouts require, for instance, a horizontal nav up top with Pages. It would be nice for a developer to be able to remove the Pages widget from the lineup if that one is already hardwired in. Ditto Search. 

Categories-- we would LOVE to see more flexibility in the tagging there! And possibly more than one category widget, so they can be split between different areas. Same goes for the links and link categories. 

Basically, the tradeoff I'm always fighting between using widgets and not using widgets is that I can't use custom template tags that specify, for instance, a certain sort order, no headline, and excluding a category or page, but in exchange for that lack of flexibility, I give flexibility to the client in other ways. If you could figure out a way to give us devs some of that custom tag functionality back, that would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a theme developer. One of my biggest gripes with the stock widget plugin is the inability to lose the h2 tag in the text widgets without hacking the widget plugin, but that shuts them off for ALL text widgets.</p>
<p>Most people who use the text widgets want to use them for ads and such. If I style the h2 tags in themes to do fun visual stuff, and we use the stock widget plugin and don&#8217;t want a headline for a specific ad block, what happens is the h2 tag shows up empty and the styling shows up also, even though we didn&#8217;t want it there. Not good. So it would be great if there was an option for each text widget to turn the h2 off. It would also be great to have this same option on Pages widget block.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a gotcha with text widgets in another way. If you populate a text widget then decide you need more text widgets, and go into admin and create them you currently LOSE the data in the ones you already created. Not good. I haven&#8217;t tried this with the rss widgets to see if there is the same problem, since I don&#8217;t use those as extensively. A way to back up or save that data or at the very least a warning in admin that people should back up the db before making changes there would lessen some headbanging.</p>
<p>Some of my layouts require, for instance, a horizontal nav up top with Pages. It would be nice for a developer to be able to remove the Pages widget from the lineup if that one is already hardwired in. Ditto Search. </p>
<p>Categories&#8211; we would LOVE to see more flexibility in the tagging there! And possibly more than one category widget, so they can be split between different areas. Same goes for the links and link categories. </p>
<p>Basically, the tradeoff I&#8217;m always fighting between using widgets and not using widgets is that I can&#8217;t use custom template tags that specify, for instance, a certain sort order, no headline, and excluding a category or page, but in exchange for that lack of flexibility, I give flexibility to the client in other ways. If you could figure out a way to give us devs some of that custom tag functionality back, that would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conceiving Widgets 2.0 by jeremy</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>Great plug-in! Great idea! It really helps people to take ownership of their blogs, which is really lacking in so many blogs. People just dont know how to improve their blogs, and widgets really make it more accessible.

Infact we started using it on the blogs at &lt;a href="http://nytimes.com/blogs" title="NYTimes.com blogs" rel="nofollow"&gt;NYTimes.com blogs&lt;/a&gt;. However we did have to make quite a few modifications to it. The current configuration only allows for one possible sidebar, we have 3 different sidebar views. It would be good to allow for multiple sidebars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great plug-in! Great idea! It really helps people to take ownership of their blogs, which is really lacking in so many blogs. People just dont know how to improve their blogs, and widgets really make it more accessible.</p>
<p>Infact we started using it on the blogs at <a href="http://nytimes.com/blogs" title="NYTimes.com blogs" rel="nofollow">NYTimes.com blogs</a>. However we did have to make quite a few modifications to it. The current configuration only allows for one possible sidebar, we have 3 different sidebar views. It would be good to allow for multiple sidebars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conceiving Widgets 2.0 by Rutger Hensel</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-10878</link>
		<dc:creator>Rutger Hensel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-10878</guid>
		<description>The Widgets should definitely be part of the WordPress download in stead of being a separate plugin. Any idea when?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Widgets should definitely be part of the WordPress download in stead of being a separate plugin. Any idea when?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on K2 by Niko</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/k2/#comment-10782</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/k2/#comment-10782</guid>
		<description>As Wes said, K2 doesnt support the plugin :x
I'm using v0.95 RC1 of K2 and if i activate it, i get the following error, when viewing my blog:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function is_active_module() in /opt/lampp/htdocs/wordpress/wp-content/themes/k2/theloop.php on line 76

Looks like the K2 guys forgot a lil bit of code there ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Wes said, K2 doesnt support the plugin <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':x' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;m using v0.95 RC1 of K2 and if i activate it, i get the following error, when viewing my blog:</p>
<p>Fatal error: Call to undefined function is_active_module() in /opt/lampp/htdocs/wordpress/wp-content/themes/k2/theloop.php on line 76</p>
<p>Looks like the K2 guys forgot a lil bit of code there <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conceiving Widgets 2.0 by TJ</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-10635</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/conceiving-widgets-20/#comment-10635</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate on the difference between developing a widget VS a plug-in?

We have an idea for functionality to add to WPress -- but Im wondering...should it be a widget? or should it be a plug-in.  Can you tell us the benefits or either or limiations of either when preparing to develop something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate on the difference between developing a widget VS a plug-in?</p>
<p>We have an idea for functionality to add to WPress &#8212; but Im wondering&#8230;should it be a widget? or should it be a plug-in.  Can you tell us the benefits or either or limiations of either when preparing to develop something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Picasa Web Matrix by J-Bo</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/picasa-web-matrix/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/picasa-web-matrix/#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>dead link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dead link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flickr Tag Cloud by frostfox</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/flickr-tag-cloud/#comment-10607</link>
		<dc:creator>frostfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widgets.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/flickr-tag-cloud/#comment-10607</guid>
		<description>http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2006/04/27/translate-widget/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2006/04/27/translate-widget/" rel="nofollow">http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2006/04/27/translate-widget/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Last.fm Music Charts by xwayz</title>
		<link>http://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/04/07/last-fm/#comment-10599</link>
		<dc:creator>xwayz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://widgets.wordpress.com/2006/04/07/last-fm/#comment-10599</guid>
		<description>i wrote my recent tracks in the field as written in last.fm but it still shows weekly artists..what is the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wrote my recent tracks in the field as written in last.fm but it still shows weekly artists..what is the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>